Renaissance of Role Playing

Recently I rediscovered the wonders of fantasy role playing games. I bought the Pathfinder Beginner Box on a whim at Christmas, remembering fondly my years of playing Dungeons and Dragons when I was a kid. There’s something deeply appealing about role playing games. They are, at their heart, a form of collective story telling. The characters and the tales created through the game rarely fail to fire the imagination.

I spent a good portion of my childhood playing D&D. We played the Dungeons & Dragons Basic Set as a family game around the kitchen table. My dad was the Dungeon Master for that first campaign. My mom was a thief, my brother a wizard, and I was a fighter. In the years that followed, I spent hours lying on the floor making detailed dungeon maps on pads of graph paper, reading the books, studying tables, copying artwork, and playing long rambling adventures with my brother, filled with deadly monsters, secret doors, and fabulous treasures.

In those early days, I didn’t know much about crafting stories (or the undead for that matter), but years of working on the craft have made writing and running adventures that much more exciting and fun. I’m currently working on a 12 part full-blown campaign featuring characters of already storied proportions. The first installment, “Shadow of the Necromancer”, is finished and play-tested. The fist section of the second installment, “The Great Goblin Invasion”, is written and we’ll be playing it this weekend. Polish up your polyhedral dice. I can’t wait!

Crypt at Maleistria now in progress…

Crypt at Maleistria, the final book in The Three Earths trilogy is finally underway. I started writing a first draft just before the new year and am now several chapters in. I’m excited for this final installment and the conclusion of a story I’ve been working on for a long time.

I continue to polish bits of the first two books, Journey to Elara and Dark Mage of Midgard, and am looking forward to when I can put all three books together into one epic story!

Stay tuned for status updates as the writing progresses.

Plain Text for Writers, Part II: A Proposal for a Plain Text Manuscript Format

Writers and editors rely on manuscript format as a common ground for reading and preparing texts for publication. Unfortunately in today’s world of electronic submissions, each individual market sometimes demands a different format for their manuscripts, complicating the submissions and editing process for writers and editors alike.

There is a Standard Manuscript Format, and most editors at least conform to this standard. However, Standard Manuscript Format is in some ways a relic of the typewriter. Although there is good rationale behind all its features, the necessity for complex formatting and file compatibility can be an issue.

A Plain Text Manuscript Format would have advantages for both writers and editors. In addition to simplicity, universal compatibility, and superior archiving, a plain text manuscript presents several other advantages. The file can be easily viewed in any preferred font, transfered to an e-book reader, pasted into the body of an email, and formatted for electronic or print publication.

A Plain Text Manuscript Format can be considered universal because it can be created or read on any computer with virtually any software. It can even be accessed from a command prompt, created on a typewriter or handwritten in a notebook. The features of the proposed format are outlined in the example below. Please note: this is a proposal only, and a suggestion for writers who wish to use plain text for their personal composition, editing, and file storage. If you are submitting a manuscript for publication, you should always follow the editor’s guidelines for manuscript formatting.

Joe Writer
4 Contact Info
City, NY 10010
(212) 555-5555
joewriter@mail.com
http://www.joewriter.com

200 words

PLAIN TEXT MANUSCRIPT FORMAT

by Joe Writer

At the top of the file should be the writer’s name and contact information. Two lines below that, the estimated word count. Four lines below that, the title in all caps. Two lines below that, the byline.The body of the manuscript should start four lines below the byline.

All text should be left justified with no indentation. Add an empty line between paragraphs for readability. Each paragraph should represent a single line of text. Word wrapping will make the text readable and printable. To add an extra line for a section break insert the number symbol like so:

#

To indicate italics, text should be surrounded by underscore marks. For example you might mention a magazine, such as _Asimov’s_ or _The New Yorker_. This will make it easy to search for italicised text and replace with italics for actual publication.

Use only a single space after punctuation. This will keep the text clean and consistent. A double space is not needed, and not preferred if using the electronic text for publication.

To indicate an em dash — puctuation that sets off a phrase — use two hyphens. To indicate … an elipses, use three periods.

Define the end of your manuscript with three number symbols on the last line of the file, like so:

###

That’s all there is to it. Since text files do not contain formatting information, it is not necessary to specify a font, margins, headers or page numbering. Two notable drawbacks to this Plain Text Manuscript Format are the lack of line spacing to allow for editing marks and the lack of page numbers for referencing areas of text. This is a legitimate concern. Solutions include saving and editing as a .pdf or adding desired additional formatting for a print copy. If printing the document, a text editor can print with page numbers and additional header information. A word processor can add formatting as necessary.

Plain Text for Writers, Part I: A Proposal for a Plain Text Manuscript Format

Plain Text for Writers, Part III: A Quick Guide to Working with Plain Text

Additional Information:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_text

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_file

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_editor

Creativity On Demand

It was another great weekend at Liz Engstrom‘s Ghost Story Workshop. Once again, a band of 13 writers gathered in Blue River to write complete short stories in a 24 hour period (<3000 words). As usual, I stayed up until about 3am Friday working on my story. I even started a second one Saturday afternoon this time.

The camaraderie is always inspiring, and the Saturday night readings were amazing. I heard some really great stories by some seriously talented writers, all written within the previous 24 hour period. It’s like hearing a new anthology, fresh off the press.

NaNoWriMo is this month and people all over are attempting to write 50,000 word novels. I can’t help thinking we should have a National Short Story Writing Weekend as well, when people could collectively try their hand at writing stories in a 24 hour period. There’s something exhilarating about the experience of creating fiction with a deadline.

Plain Text for Writers, Part I: An Argument for the Use of Plain Text

Writers have a vested interest in the tools they work with and the preservation of their work. Today, almost all writers use a computer at some stage of their work, but in the age of ubiquitous word processors, few have considered the benefits of plain text. When you use a word processor or save a file in .docx, .doc, or even .rtf format, your file is unreadable without the software to decode it. It might look something like this if opened in a text editor:

MÄn‡i‰–ØP¢@ÒI}Úã€Ãºa‡Øm‡a[Ø¥û4Ù:lЯ°GR’ÅX^’6ØŠ­>$ùãûÿ©«×îÇ!)OÚ^ýrÍC$ñy@“°íÝö/­yH*œ˜ñ„´½)‘Þµ÷ß»Š×`}

or this:

7509af678b985ab0b6b4ae6f7ed9ba6c4170b06c788a705430adf71bad2b5b057d03606a1ed7ebf5babd7a41cf00b0

Good luck reading your brilliant work. In contrast, a .txt file (plain text) can be opened in a readable format by any text editor or word processor on any platform. It can even be accessed from a command line.

Without getting too political (software companies control the decoding of your information), or philosophical (WYSIWYG is not what you think), or ideological (plain text is free text), the following will argue for the use of plain text for writers on the basis of its simplicity and content oriented focus, cross-platform compatibility, and benefits for long term archiving.

Writing is the logical and artful arrangement of words to express thoughts. It is not choosing fonts, indentations, headers, footers, gutters, and margins. Formatting is best done when preparing a document for a specific purpose or publication. Writing in plain text offers a simple environment focused on the task at hand. Your manuscripts will stay clean and free of unnecessary code. Plain text can be easily pasted into other applications, and can always be formatted later using a word processor.

Everybody knows there are compatibility issues with word processors. Even software that claims to be compatible with .doc or .rtf, for example, sometimes have issues. Writers need to know that they can access their files from any computer or device, use the text in other applications, and share them without worrying about compatibility issues. No other file format is as cross compatible as plain text.

Now more than ever, master documents are likely to be stored in electronic format. Not only are plain text files more compatible than any other file format, they take up less disk space and avoid a lot of the data storage problems encountered with other file formats. Say you need to access a short story you wrote on a computer in 1985? If you saved it in plain text, it’s no problem. Want your files to be readable in the year 2185? Again, save them in plain text.

Alas, there are some obstacles to using plain text as a writer. The first is finding a good text editor. Most word processors can save documents in plain text, so you could really use anything, but a text editor is designed to work with plain text. Most text editor are made with programmers in mind though, and many lack features that are important to writers, like spell check and word count. There are some good free ones though, and some even better commercial ones. I recommend NoteTab Pro for a feature rich environment and Q10 for simplicity.

Acceptability is also an issue. Standard manuscript formats are based on typewritten manuscripts and can only be formatted using a word processor. Unless plain text formats are adopted, editors are still going to want manuscripts as an .rtf in standard manuscript format. This means it’s necessary to format the text file before sending it out. An extra step, but it’s easy to do, and worth it for the benefits of working with plain text.

Plain Text for Writers, Part II: A Proposal for a Plain Text Manuscript Format

Plain Text for Writers, Part III: A Quick Guide to Working with Plain Text

Additional Information:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_text

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_file

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_editor

Email Subscription Now Available

If you have an interest in following my work, you can now subscribe to my website by clicking the button at the top of the sidebar. You will then receive email notifications for new posts to the site. Want to know when I have a new story coming out, follow the progress on my latest book projects, or read my latest journal entries? Sign up. There’s no risk. You can choose the frequency of notifications and unsubscribe at any time.

Thanks to everyone who signs up. There will be more exciting changes soon and I look forward to bringing you some great stories in the coming months.

Borders Liquidation

Took a stroll through the local Borders liquidation sale today. There was a strange feel in there. The cafe was closed, many of the shelves were in disarray, and it felt a little like a sign of the times. Is it the end of books as we know them?

Paper books will surely persist for a long time to come, but book stores may not. The book industry is changing quickly. I’m not sure anybody really knows what it will look like ten years from now, but it’s likely to be very different.

Will the downfall of big chain bookstores allow smaller stores to flourish again, or are we seeing the end of brick and mortar bookstores all together?